1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 105 N.J.
  5. 105 N.J. Super. 184 (1969)
 

WHITE v. WHITE

105 N.J. Super. 184 (1969)

251 A.2d 470

EUSTACE WHITE AND ARNOLD TANNER, CO-EXECUTORS UNDER THE WILL OF THOMAS E. CATCHPOLE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS, v. JAMES WHITE, ROGER WHITE AND MARGARET W. TANNER, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided March 19, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arnold Tanner, attorney for plaintiffs.

Mr. Daniel J. O'Hern for defendant James White (Messrs. Abramoff, Apy & O'Hern, attorneys).

Mr. William R. Blair, Jr. for defendants Roger White and Margaret W. Tanner (Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Warren, attorneys).

LANE, J.C.S.

This action was instituted by the executors under the will of Thomas E. Catchpole, deceased, to obtain a construction of his will executed November 25, 1953. Defendant James White, a grandnephew of decedent, is the devisee of a house and lot under paragraph Third. Defendants Roger White and Margaret Tanner are given an interest in the proceeds of a sale of the real property devised under paragraph Third...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases