1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 412 F.2d
  5. 412 F.2d 899 (1969)
 

HOLLY SUGAR CORP. v. DISTILLERY, RECTIFYING, WINE & A. W. I. U.

No. 22152.

412 F.2d 899 (1969)

HOLLY SUGAR CORP., Appellant, v. DISTILLERY, RECTIFYING, WINE & ALLIED WORKERS INT'L UNION, AFL-CIO, et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 9, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Paras (argued), J. Hart Clinton, George F. Clinton and John J. Sampson, of Morrison, Foerster, Holloway, Clinton & Clark, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Roland C. Davis (argued) and Alan C. Davis, of Carroll, Davis, Burdick & McDonough, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG, and ELY, Circuit Judges.

ELY, Circuit Judge:

Again we meet a problem concerning enforcement of arbitration awards. The appellant employer, Holly Sugar, insists that the award should not be enforced because the arbitrator, in making it, exceeded his powers as defined by the bargaining agreement. The District Court rejected the argument and declared the award binding in all respects. We affirm.

The parties to the bargaining compact are the three major producers of California

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases