1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 412 F.2d
  5. 412 F.2d 830 (1969)
 

CHICKEN DELIGHT, INC. v. HARRIS

No. 23959.

412 F.2d 830 (1969)

CHICKEN DELIGHT, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. George B. HARRIS, District Judge, Respondent. Harvey S. Siegel et al., Real Parties in Interest.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 2, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Laurence Popofsky, Richard L. Goff, Stephen V. Bomse, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners; Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, Cal., of counsel.

Broad, Busterud & Khourie, San Francisco, Cal., for Siegel, and others.

Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., for respondent.

Before BARNES, ELY and CARTER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In a Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the Petitioners challenge a portion of an Order issued by the District Court on March 5, 1969.

The Real Parties in Interest, Plaintiffs below, are five of some six-hundred fifty franchisees of the Petitioners who seek treble damages for Petitioners' alleged unlawful monopolistic practices. They successfully advanced their contention that their suit was properly maintainable as a class action under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases