1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 456 P.2d
  5. 456 P.2d 779 (1969)
 

ROSENBERG v. TOETLY

No. 10255.

456 P.2d 779 (1969)

93 Idaho 135

Henry A. ROSENBERG and Mary Rosenberg, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Carl TOETLY, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 27, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ware, Stellmon & O'Connell, Lewiston, for appellant.

Philip E. Peterson, Lewiston, for appellees.

McFADDEN, Chief Justice.

Mr. and Mrs. Henry Rosenberg, the respondents herein, instituted this action against Mr. Carl Toetly, the appellant, to recover damages they sustained in an automobile accident allegedly caused by Mr. Toetly's negligent operation of his automobile. Following a jury trial which resulted in a verdict for Mr. Toetly, the Rosenbergs moved for a new trial, which motion was granted. Mr. Toetly has appealed...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases