MEAD v. CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY

No. 23413.

415 F.2d 767 (1969)

John Lyle MEAD, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 13, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick P. Furth (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

James A. Aiello (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Derald E. Granberg, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and KILKENNY, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a California parolee, appeals from an order of the District Court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant contended below and here contends that the appellee's revocation of his parole violated his constitutional rights because one of the conditions of parole, for violation of which his parole was revoked, was void and because he was not afforded counsel at the time his parole was revoked.

Appellant was released on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases