UNITED STATES v. HEIMAN

No. 23494.

406 F.2d 767 (1969)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Bruce Charles HEIMAN, also known as Bruce Hyman, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

January 30, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Metz (argued), of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

John G. Milano (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Bruce Charles Heiman appeals from his conviction on a charge of unlawfully selling, delivering and disposing of five hundred LSD pills, an hallucinogenic drug within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 321(v) (3) and 21 C.F.R. 166.3(c) (3), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331(q) (2).

Heiman's only argument here is that 21 U.S.C. § 331(q) (2) is unconstitutional. Specifically, he contends that in enacting 21 U.S.C. § 331(q) (2), Congress...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases