1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 409 F.2d
  5. 409 F.2d 631 (1969)
 

ELECTROMEC DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. N. L. R. B.

No. 22464.

409 F.2d 631 (1969)

ELECTROMEC DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 27, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. L. Hofvendahl (argued), of Cottrell, Hofvendahl & Roessler, San Jose, Cal., for petitioner.

Leon M. Kestenbaum (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Lawrence M. Joseph, Atty., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Before JERTBERG and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.

Electromec Design and Development Co., Inc. (hereafter Electromec), petitions to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Sec. 10(f) (29 U.S.C. § 160(f)), of the National Labor Relations Act as amended (61 Stat. 136, 73 Stat. 519), and the Board petitions to enforce the order under Sec. 10(e) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e). The Board's decision appears at 168 N.L.R.B. 107, 67 L.R.R.M. 1067 (1967...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases