TEN BRINK v. MOKMA

Docket No. 3,520.

13 Mich. App. 85 (1968)

163 N.W.2d 687

TEN BRINK v. MOKMA.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided August 28, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Azkoul & Krupp, for plaintiffs.

Smith, Haughey & Rice, for defendant Continental Securities Company, Inc.


QUINN, J.

The trial judge granted defendant Continental Securities Company, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(3) on the basis that defendant Mokma, an employee of Continental, was not within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident, hence the employer was not liable. On leave granted, plaintiffs appeal.

The sole issue is whether as a matter of law defendant Mokma was not within the scope of his employment at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases