UNSATISFIED FUND v. BOWMAN

[No. 214, September Term, 1967.] [No. 297, September Term, 1967.]

249 Md. 705 (1968)

241 A.2d 714

UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD v. BOWMAN, ET AL. BRAMBLE v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 9, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Scanlon and William E. Brannan, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and Howard J. McGrath, on the brief, for appellant in No. 214.

J. Robert Carey for appellees in No. 214.

L. Edgar Brown and Marvin H. Smith for appellant in No. 297.

William E. Brannan, Assistant Attorney General, and Raymond S. Smethurst, Jr., with whom were Adkins, Potts & Smethurst and Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, on the brief, for appellee in No. 297.


HORNEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question presented by these appeals concerns the maximum amount recoverable from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund on judgments obtained after April 1, 1965 for damages arising out of motor vehicle accidents occurring prior to that date.

Chapter 81 of the Laws of 1964, effective April 1, 1965, repealed and reenacted with amendments §§ 119(3) (a), 122, 134(b), 162(a) and 172 of Article 66 1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases