1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 402 F.2d
  5. 402 F.2d 525 (1968)
 

GALLENKAMP STORES CO. v. N. L. R. B.

Nos. 21621, 21632 and 21649.

402 F.2d 525 (1968)

GALLENKAMP STORES CO.; Mercury Distributing Company; Acme Quality Paints; and F. & G. Merchandising, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Retail Clerks Union Local 770, Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. K-MART, a division of S. S. Kresge Company, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Retail Clerks Union Local 770, Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. HOLLYWOOD HAT CO., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Retail Clerks Union Local 770, Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 8, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley E. Tobin (argued), Hill, Farrer & Burrill, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Hollywood Hat Co.

John C. Donnelly (argued), Hill, Farrer & Burrill, Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., Clark, Klein, Winter, Parson & Prewitt, Detroit, Mich., for appellant K-Mart.

Carl W. Robertson (argued), of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants Gallenkamp Stores Co. and others.

Kenneth M. Schwartz (argued), of Arnold, Smith & Schwartz, Los Angeles, Cal., for intervenor.

Leonard M. Wagman (argued), Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jerrold H. Shapiro, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Ralph E. Kennedy, Reg. Director, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for National Labor Relations Bd.

Before HAMLEY, ELY and CARTER, Circuit Judges.

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.

These cases come before the court on petitions to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, (hereafter the Board), issued against the petitioners, and on the Board's cross-petitions for enforcement of the order, pursuant to Section 10(e) and (f) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, (hereafter the Act), 61 Stat. 136, 73 Stat. 519, 29 U.S.C. § 160(e) and (f). The Board's final decision and order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases