Per Curiam.
The appellant claims that he was denied a fair trial because he was incarcerated and without counsel for approximately three months after his arrest and therefore had no means of contacting his alibi witnesses before their memories of the events constituting his alibi had dimmed.
It would be superfluous to discuss the merits of this claim, as we did a comparable claim on the direct appeal from the judgment of conviction in State v...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
