ANDROSKI v. LUCKETT


434 S.W.2d 324 (1968)

Keith ANDROSKI, Appellant, v. Bert S. LUCKETT, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

November 15, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hanish & Hanish, Louisville, for appellant.

Charles E. Duncan, John L. Knopf, Louisville, for appellee.


DAVIS, Commissioner.

Keith Androski, plaintiff in the trial court, appeals from the judgment entered upon a "dog-fall" verdict in his action against Bert S. Luckett for alleged damages incurred in an automobile accident. The appellant contends that: (1) He was entitled to a directed verdict, and (2) the physical facts were so conclusive as to refute appellee's theory of the accident as a matter of law.

Androski was driving his car westwardly on the Outer Loop...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases