Per Curiam.
The State now questions the award only as it proceeded on the basis of full frontage value for the property taken, rather than the acreage valuation to which the State's expert testified; the result of which would be to reduce the award by $425. The evidence warranted, first, the adoption of frontage values and, second, the finding that cuts, fills and changes in grade "effectively converted [the major portion of the frontage] into agricultural...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
