LURALINE PRODUCTS CORP. v. ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING, INC.

No. 67-189.

207 So.2d 502 (1968)

LURALINE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Rehearing Denied March 11, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Myers, Kaplan & Porter, Miami, for appellant.

Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.


PEARSON, Judge.

The appellant, who was defendant in an action for alleged wrongful garnishment and malicious prosecution, appeals a final judgment for the plaintiff, appellee. Appellant originally sued appellee and secured the issuance of several writs of garnishment before judgment. The appellee maintained that the suit was baseless and that the garnishment was wrongful, because appellant held a check issued in full payment. Appellant claimed a larger amount.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases