1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 38 Wis.2d
  5. 38 Wis.2d 656 (1968)
 

LOOMANS v. MILWAUKEE MUT. INS. CO.

38 Wis.2d 656 (1968)

LOOMANS and another, Respondents, v. MILWAUKEE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and another, Appellants. [Case No. 178.] ECONOMY FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent, v. MILWAUKEE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. [Case No. 179.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 7, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Hoeffel, Coughlin & Bayorgeon of Appleton, and oral argument by James T. Bayorgeon.

For the respondents there was a brief by Patri, Nolan, Crane & Engler and Gary R. Yakes, all of Oshkosh, and oral argument by Mr. Yakes.

HALLOWS, C. J.

Did the order sufficiently set forth reasons?

Every order granting a new trial should specify the grounds therefor. The absence of such specifications does not void the order except in the case of an order granted in the interest of justice. Otherwise, if no grounds are stated for the granting of a new trial, it is deemed to be for error. Sec. 270.49 (2), Stats. This section requires an order granting a new trial in the interest of justice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases