1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 39 Wis.2d
  5. 39 Wis.2d 631 (1968)
 

RENNER v. STATE

Nos. 70-73.

39 Wis.2d 631 (1968)

159 N.W.2d 618

RENNER (Carol), Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error. [Case Nos. 70, 71.] RENNER (Lloyd), Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error. [Case Nos. 72, 73.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 28, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiffs in error there was a brief and oral argument by Robert H. Friebert, public defender.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by E. Michael McCann, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and David J. Cannon, district attorney.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The principal contention of the state public defender on this appeal is that the statements of both Carol and Lloyd were involuntary. It is his contention that under the ruling of Jackson v. Denno (1964), 378 U.S. 368, 84 Sup. Ct. 1774, 12 L. Ed. 2d 908, 1 A. L. R. 2d 1205, and State ex rel. Goodchild v. Burke (1965), 27 Wis.2d 244...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases