1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 39 Wis.2d
  5. 39 Wis.2d 619 (1968)
 

LEHMANN v. STATE

No. State 131.

39 Wis.2d 619 (1968)

159 N.W.2d 607

LEHMANN, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 28, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Andrew J. Zafis and Zafis & Rummel, all of Oconomowoc, and by Agnes Loizeaux of Marinette, and oral argument by Andrew J. Zafis.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and Daniel J. Miron, district attorney of Marinette county.

BEILFUSS, J.

The issues presented on this appeal are as follows:

1. Should the trial court have excluded evidence concerning the defendant's lack of license and registration as a livestock dealer?

2. Is the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction?

3. Should the evidence of the defendant's prior misconduct have been excluded?

4. Should the court adopt a rule requiring presentence reports...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases