Upon the trial, the defendant did not testify nor did he produce any witnesses which, of course, was his constitutional right and privilege. His main contention on this appeal, however, is that he was denied an opportunity to present his defense because the prosecutor called witnesses who had also been subpœnaed by the defendant. This attack upon his conviction lacks foundation and contains no merit whatsoever. The prosecution, by...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
