1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 39 Wis.2d
  5. 39 Wis.2d 566 (1968)
 

BABLER v. ROELLI

No. 260.

39 Wis.2d 566 (1968)

159 N.W.2d 694

BABLER, Appellant, v. ROELLI, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 28, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Vine & Schmitz of Monroe, attorneys, and Jasper, Winner, Perina & Rouse and John H. Rouse, all of Madison, of counsel, and oral argument by William J. Schmitz.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Ervin W. Johnson of Darlington.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The appellant does not contend on this appeal that the facts are sufficient to prove a conventional contract. Rather, he relies on the same facts to prove a cause of action in promissory estoppel.

At the very outset we are confronted with the question of whether the question of promissory estoppel is properly before us. A perusal of the complaint indicates, without a doubt, that all that was pleaded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases