DODD v. COPELAND, ET AL.


52 N.J. 537 (1968)

247 A.2d 129

WILLIAM DODD, EDWARD DODD, AND MARION ELIZABETH DODD, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE R. COPELAND, GEORGE D. COPELAND, AND SAMUEL J. COX, DEFENDANTS, SAMUEL J. COX AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND, APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 4, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bruce D. Herrigel argued the cause for appellants, cross-respondents (Messrs. Herrigel and Herrigel, attorneys).

Mr. John J. Trombadore argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents, cross-appellants (Messrs. Trombadore and Trombadore, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons given in the majority opinion, 99 N.J.Super. 481 (1968).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases