1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 40 Wis.2d
  5. 40 Wis.2d 536 (1968)
 

STATE v. HARRELL

No. State 15.

40 Wis.2d 536 (1968)

162 N.W.2d 590

STATE, Respondent, v. HARRELL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 26, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Daniel J. Weiss of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Harold B. Jackson, Jr., assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and David J. Cannon, district attorney.

HEFFERNAN, J.

Was the statement following the morgue visit admissible

The evidence indicated that the defendant was brought to the Safety Building at approximately 2:45 in the morning of July 4th. He was advised of his constitutional right to counsel and his right to remain silent. Shortly thereafter he was taken to the morgue to view the body of his wife. He was in the morgue for less than five minutes. He...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases