NASH v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

Docket No. 1,183.

12 Mich. App. 553 (1968)

163 N.W.2d 471

NASH v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Rehearing denied November 6, 1968.

Leave to appeal granted February 11, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rothe, Marston, Mazey, Sachs & O'Connell, for plaintiffs.

Alexander, Buchanan & Conklin (Donald E. Miller, of counsel), for defendant Heidt's Protective Service, Inc.

Bodman, Longley, Bogle, Armstrong & Dahling (Michael B. Lewiston, of counsel), for defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company.


Leave to appeal granted February 11, 1969. See 381 Mich. 800.

LESINSKI, C.J.

Defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company appeals from a judgment totaling $17,250 on a verdict entered below for plaintiffs, Mary Lee Nash and Dan Nash. Sears seeks a reversal and remand for new trial, or, in the alternative, a setting aside of the judgment of "no cause" against it on its cross-claim against codefendant Heidt's Protective Service, Inc., for entry of judgment against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases