1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 40 Wis.2d
  5. 40 Wis.2d 516 (1968)
 

STATE v. MIDELL

No. State 17.

40 Wis.2d 516 (1968)

162 N.W.2d 54

STATE, Respondent, v. MIDELL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 1, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Harvey L. McCormick of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Terence T. Evans, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and David J. Cannon, district attorney.

CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.

Five issues are presented for determination on this appeal.

1. Did the interval between the date of the alleged offense and the date of arrest deprive the defendant of due process of law?

2. Did the trial court err in not requiring a witness to disclose the identity of an informer?

3. Were the facts as alleged in the complaint sufficient to permit a finding of probable cause for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases