STATE v. MUHAMMAD

No. State 37.

41 Wis.2d 12 (1968)

162 N.W.2d 567

STATE, Respondent, v. MUHAMMAD, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided December 3, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by L. William Staudenmaier of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Harold B. Jackson, Jr., assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and David J. Cannon, district attorney.


WILKIE, J.

Defendant frontally attacks his conviction as being founded on a jury verdict supported by insufficient evidence.

". . . On an appeal in a criminal case the test of the sufficiency of the evidence for a conviction is `whether the evidence adduced, believed and rationally considered by the jury, was sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'"1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases