1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 14 Ohio
  5. 14 Ohio St. 2d 256 (1968)
 

STATE v. PERRY

No. 41168.

14 Ohio St. 2d 256 (1968)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. PERRY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 12, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David D. Dowd, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Ira G. Turpin, for appellee.

Messrs. Berkman, Gordon & Kancelbaum, Mr. Bernard A. Berkman and Mr. Joshua J. Kancelbaum, for appellant.

O'NEILL, J.

The first question which this court must determine is: Does the exclusionary rule announced in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, require the court to exclude the testimony of the police officer, who apprehended the appellant, concerning the inculpatory statements appellant made to that officer at the scene of the crime, for the reason that such statements were made prior to the giving of any warnings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases