1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 39 Wis.2d
  5. 39 Wis.2d 191 (1968)
 

BERLINSKI v. TELISKY

No. 237.

39 Wis.2d 191 (1968)

168 N.W.2d 925

BERLINSKI, Special Administrator, and another, Appellants, v. TELISKY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 4, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Rudolph W. Talsky, attorney, and Francis L. McElligott of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Talsky.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Bernard F. Mathiowetz of Milwaukee.

WILKIE, J.

Appellants have made it exceedingly difficult to review this case on its merits since there is no appendix. Sec. (Rule) 251.34 (5), Stats., requires such an appendix.

In Lindahl v. Lindahl1 this court said:

"... The purpose of this rule is to enable us in the limited time available to give due consideration to all the cases presented to us."

On page 6 of appellants' brief they state:

"On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases