TITUSVILLE CABLE TV, INC. v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 16559, 16650.

404 F.2d 1187 (1968)

TITUSVILLE CABLE TV, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America and Federal Communications Commission, Respondents, Lamb Enterprises, Inc., Intervenor. Byron McCRACKEN, Jr., d/b/a South Side Cable Company, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America and Federal Communications Commission, Respondents, Lamb Enterprises, Inc., Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided December 23, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George J. Barco, Barco & Barco, Meadville, Pa., for petitioner Titusville Cable TV, Inc.

Spencer Ervin, Jr., Tate & Ervin, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner Byron McCracken.

Lenore G. Ehrig, F. C. C., Washington, D. C., for respondent Federal Communications Commission.

Herbert M. Schulkind, Fly, Shuebruk, Blume & Gaguine, Washington, D. C., for intervenor Lamb Enterprises, Inc.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners, Titusville Cable TV, Inc. and Byron McCracken, Jr., who operates under the name South Side Cable Company, seek review of separate memorandum opinions and orders of the Federal Communications Commission denying their petitions for waiver of the nonduplication provisions of 47 C.F.R. 74.1103(F). Review is sought pursuant to Section 402(a) of the Communications Act of 19341

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases