PACIFIC SEAFARERS, INC. v. PACIFIC FAR EAST LINE, INC.

No. 21173.

404 F.2d 804 (1968)

PACIFIC SEAFARERS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC FAR EAST LINE, INC., et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided September 30, 1968.

Certiorari Denied February 24, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert E. Sher, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Abraham J. Harris, Marvin J. Coles and Neal M. Mayer, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Donald D. Webster, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellants.

Mr. Frederick M. Rowe, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. James M. Johnstone, Bertram Walker Rein, Washington, D. C., Edward D. Ransom, Gordon L. Poole, and R. Frederic Fisher, San Francisco, Cal., were on the brief, for appellees, Pacific Far East Line, Inc., et al.

Mr. Verne W. Vance, Jr., Boston, Mass., with whom Mr. Henry E. Foley, Boston, Mass., was on the brief, for appellee Farrell Lines, Inc.

Messrs. James N. Jacobi and Richard W. Kurrus, Washington, D. C., entered appearances for appellee American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.

Mrs. Amy Scupi, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellee American Union Transport, Inc.

Mr. Robert Burk, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellee Matson Navigation Co.

Mr. J. Franklin Fort, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellee Moore and McCormack Co., Inc.

Mr. Donald J. Mulvihill, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellee Grace Line, Inc.

Mr. John K. Mallory, Jr., Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellee Waterman Steamship Corporation.

Mr. Elmer C. Maddy, New York City, entered an appearance for appellee Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., et al.

Before McGOWAN, TAMM and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.


Certiorari Denied February 24, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 872.

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

This case concerns the applicability of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act to an alleged conspiracy among defendant-appellees, 21 American shipping lines and two conferences to which they belong,1 to destroy plaintiff-appellants' business of carrying AID2-financed cement and fertilizer cargoes between Taiwan and South...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases