1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 439 P.2d
  5. 439 P.2d 624 (1968)
 

CITY OF TUALATIN v. CITY OF DURHAM

439 P.2d 624 (1968)

CITY OF TUALATIN, Oregon, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent, v. CITY OF DURHAM, Oregon, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, Washington County, Oregon, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided April 10, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cleveland C. Cory, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Stanley R. Church, Lake Oswego, and Davies, Biggs, Strayer, Stoel & Boley, Portland.

DeMar L. Batchelor, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Schwenn, Bradley & Batchelor, Hillsboro.

Before PERRY, C.J., and SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LANGTRY, JJ.

LANGTRY, Justice, Pro Tem.

The transcript and exhibits indicate that this case is part of a continuing controversy involving the cities of Tualatin and Durham and some residents of the surrounding area in Washington County, over expansion of city limits. The cities are small. (The current Oregon Blue Book lists Tualatin's population as 462 and Durham's as 240.) Tualatin was incorporated in 1913. In recent years it annexed territory, some of which it zoned industrial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases