ANTANITIS v. HECHT


432 Pa. 620 (1968)

Antanitis v. Hecht, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

November 12, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis H. Patrono, with him Robert D. Beck, and Patrono, Ceisler and Edwards, for appellant.

Stephen I. Richman, with him Greenlee, Richman, Derrico & Posa, for appellee.

Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.


OPINION PER CURIAM, November 12, 1968:

This is an appeal by defendant after a jury verdict for plaintiffs in claims arising from an automobile collision. The evidence as to negligence was conflicting, the verdicts were not excessive, and there was no error of law or abuse of discretion in the lower Court's refusal to grant a new trial or a judgment n.o.v.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice MUSMANNO did not participate in the decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases