CONSOLIDATED-HAMMER DRY PLATE & F. CO. v. RENEGOTIATION BD.

No. 15806.

375 F.2d 591 (1967)

CONSOLIDATED-HAMMER DRY PLATE AND FILM COMPANY, Petitioner, v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

April 11, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice P. Raizes, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.

David L. Rose, and Robert C. McDiarmid, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Barefoot Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before KNOCH, KILEY and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges.


KNOCH, Circuit Judge.

The Renegotiation Board, respondent herein, decided that the petitioner, Consolidated-Hammer Dry Plate and Film Company, had realized $75,000 excessive profits on renegotiable contracts during the taxable year 1951. The Tax Court on appeal came to the same conclusion.

In this Court, the petitioner seeks review contending that the Tax Court erred in failing (1) to find the petitioner exempt from the Renegotiation Act of 1951, Title 50...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases