Arthur SHELTON, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE, Appellee.
Harvey Marion BOSWELL, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE, Appellee.
Donald L. SMITH, Appellant,
v.
Hugh RIVERS, Chairman, District of Columbia Board of Parole et al., Appellees.
Elbert Henry WHITE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE et al., Appellees.
John L. JACOBS, Appellant,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE et al., Appellees.
George L. WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
Paul H. PRESTON, Superintendent, District of Columbia Jail, Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 10, June 16, March 29, and June 27, 1967.
Decided November 1, 1967.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Jim W. Gipple, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), for appellant in No. 20,591.
Mr. Edward T. Miller, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Mr. David G. Bress, U. S. Atty., Mr. Frank Q. Nebeker, Miss Ellen Lee Park and Mr. E. Grey Lewis, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee in No. 20,591.
Mr. Richard Shlakman, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), for appellant in No. 20,674.
Mr. Robert S. Brady, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David G. Bress, U. S. Atty., Frank Q. Nebeker and E. Grey Lewis, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee in No. 20,674.
Mr. Joseph M. Snee, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), for appellants in Nos. 20,685-20,687 and 20,823.
Mr. Lee A. Freeman, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., argued for appellee in Nos. 20,685-20,687.
Mr. Joel Finkelstein, Washington, D. C., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, argued for appellee in No. 20,823.
Messrs. David G. Bress, U. S. Atty., and Frank Q. Nebeker, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the briefs for appellees.
Mr. Nathan Dodell, Asst. U. S. Atty., was on the brief for appellee in Nos. 20,685-20,687.
Mr. Thomas Lumbard, Asst. U. S. Atty., was on the brief for appellee in No. 20,823.
Before WRIGHT, McGOWAN and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
THE PAROLE BOARD CASES.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT
In a group of cases decided today, we have pondered a number of problems that arise in the administrative process of the United States Board of Parole or the District of Columbia Parole Board, leading to a determination whether a parolee has violated his parole or mandatory release, and, if so, what action is appropriate. We provide herewith a prefatory memorandum...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
