1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 37 Wis.2d
  5. 37 Wis.2d 56 (1967)
 

JONES v. STATE

37 Wis.2d 56 (1967)

JONES, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 28, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Patrick T. McMahon of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by E. Michael McCann, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

WILKIE, J.

Four issues are raised by the writ of error:

1. Was certain testimony by police officers concerning the description given to them by an eyewitness improperly admitted into evidence?

2. Is the evidence sufficient to support the verdict?

3. Should the Supreme Court grant a new trial in the interest of justice, pursuant to sec. 251.09, Stats.?

4. Does a twenty-eight-day interval between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases