CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION

Nos. 23188, 23189, 23325, 23333, 23408, 23454, 23455, 21286, 21575, 21856.

378 F.2d 510 (1967)

CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY, Austral Oil Company, Incorporated, Bright and Schiff, Blanco Oil Company and Killian and Hurd, Shell Oil Company, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent, The Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Long Island Lighting Company, Philadelphia Gas Works, Division of the United Gas Improvement Company, Intervenors. The BROOKLYN UNION GAS COMPANY, Long Island Lighting Company, Philadelphia Gas Works, Division of the United Gas Improvement Company, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent, Texaco, Inc., Gulf Oil Corporation, Inc., Humble Oil Company, Inc., Austral Oil Company, Inc., McCurdy and McCurdy, Sun Oil Company, Pan American Petroleum Corp., Jonnell Gas, Inc., Bright and Schiff, Shell Oil Company, Intervenors. Margaret Hunt HILL, Trustee for Hassie Hunt Trust, H. L. Hunt, Hunt Oil Company, Lamar Hunt, Trustee for William Herbert Hunt Trust Estate, A. G. Hill, Trustee for Lamar Hunt Trust Estate, George W. Graham, Inc., Placid Oil Company, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. HUNT OIL COMPANY, Lamar Hunt, Trustee for William Herbert Hunt Trust Estate, A. G. Hill, Trustee for Lamar Hunt Trust Estate, Placid Oil Company, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 24, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

No. 23188:

Thomas H. Burton, Joseph C. Johnson, Bruce R. Merrill, Houston, Tex., Francis H. Caskin, Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

No. 23189:

W. H. Drushel, Jr., J. Evans Attwell, Houston, Tex., for petitioners.

No. 23333:

George B. Mickum, III, Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

No. 23408:

Thomas G. Johnson, New York City, for petitioners.

No. 23454:

Edwin F. Russell, Harry G. Hill, Jr., Barbara M. Suchow, Brooklyn, N. Y., William T. Coleman, Jr., Robert W. Maris, Philadelphia, Pa., Edward M. Barrett, Bertram D. Moll, Mineola, N. Y., Morton L. Simons, Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

No. 23455:

Kent H. Brown, Albany, N. Y., Barbara M. Suchow, Brooklyn, N. Y., for petitioners.

Nos. 21286 and 21575:

Richard F. Generelly, Washington, D. C., Thomas G. Crouch, Robert W. Henderson, Paul W. Hicks, Dallas, Tex., for petitioners.

No. 21856:

Paul W. Hicks, Thomas G. Crouch, Dallas, Tex., for petitioners.

Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., FPC, Richard A. Solomon, Gen. Counsel, FPC, Paul A. Sweeney, Atty., for FPC in Nos. 21286, 21575 and 21856.

Robert A. Jablon, Atty., for FPC in Nos. 23188, 23189, 23325, 23333, 23408, 23454 and 23455.

Nos. 23188, 23189, 23333, and 23408:

Edwin F. Russell, Harry G. Hill, Jr., Barbara M. Suchow, Brooklyn, N. Y., William T. Coleman, Jr., Robert W. Maris, Philadelphia, Pa., Edward M. Barrett, Bertram D. Moll, Mineola, N. Y., Morton L. Simons, Washington, D. C., Martin N. Erck, Houston, Tex., for intervenors.

Nos. 23454 and 23455:

W. H. Drushel, Jr., J. Evans Attwell, Houston, Tex., Robert B. Payne, Thomas G. Crouch, Dallas, Tex., Richard F. Generelly, Robert E. May, Washington, D. C., Phillip D. Endom, Philadelphia, Pa., Philip R. Ehrenkranz, Carroll L. Gilliam, Washington, D. C., J. P. Hammond, Clifford O. Stone, Jr., Tulsa, Okl., Dean J. Capp, Houston, Tex., Warren M. Sparks, Donald R. Arnett, Tulsa, Okl., Carl Illig, Houston, Tex., Jesse H. Foster, Houston, Tex., James K. Schooler, Houston, Tex., William R. Slye, Houston, Tex., Leo J. Hoffman, Dallas, Tex., for intervenors.

Oliver Stone, New York City, for intervenor only in No. 23454.

Thomas G. Johnson, New York City, for intervenor only in No. 23454.

Before BROWN, BELL and DYER, Circuit Judges.


DYER, Circuit Judge:

Three groups of cases raise in a variety of ways the validity of the Federal Power Commission's "in-line" price pronouncement, its statement of general policy, moratorium ceilings, and refund requirements.

In the first group the producer petitioners1 pursuant to § 19(b) of the Natural Gas Act,2 challenge an order of the FPC of September 30, 1965, in a consolidated proceeding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases