STRACK v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO.


35 Wis.2d 51 (1967)

STRACK, Respondent, v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 9, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Beckwith & Hollern of Madison, and oral argument by Richard A. Hollern.

For the respondent there was a brief by Robert I. Perina and Jasper, Winner, Perina & Rouse, all of Madison, and oral argument by Robert I. Perina.


HALLOWS, J.

The safe-place statute requires a place of employment to be kept as safe as the nature of the premises reasonably permits. There is no question that the A & P store was a place of employment or that Nellie Strack was a frequenter thereof or that she slipped on the little Italian prune and suffered certain injuries. The issue is whether A & P had sufficient notice of the presence of the plum on the floor so that it can be held negligent for failing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases