Appeal from all intermediate orders, as limited in appellant's brief to an order of said court dated May 24, 1965, which denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence, dismissed as academic. With respect to the grand larceny count, it was incumbent upon the prosecution to adduce competent proof of value. The complainant gave a vague description of the property alleged to have been stolen and testified, over objection, as to the value thereof, except with respect to a set...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
