Order affirmed, without costs.
In our opinion, the application was timely, since no judgment had been entered as required by subdivision (b) of section 618 of the Insurance Law, and the period of limitation had not therefore commenced. It is our further opinion that reasonable efforts were made by petitioner to ascertain the identity of the "hit and run" motor vehicle and of the owner and operator thereof. A hearing at this stage is not required. If so advised, MVAIC...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.