1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 36 Wis.2d
  5. 36 Wis.2d 661 (1967)
 

GAGE v. SEAL

36 Wis.2d 661 (1967)

GAGE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SEAL and another, Defendants and Appellants: STOKELY-VAN CAMP, INC., and another, Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 28, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendants-appellants there was a brief by Everson, Whitney, O'Melia, Everson & Brehm of Green Bay, and oral argument by James L. Everson.

For the plaintiff-respondent there was a brief by Bachman, Cummings & McIntyre of Appleton, and oral argument by J. Joseph Cummings.

For the defendants-respondents there was a brief by Welsh, Trowbridge, Bills, Planert & Gould of Green Bay, and oral argument by Lloyd J. Planert.

HANLEY, J.

The appellant Sandra Seal contends that she is entitled to a new trial because it was prejudicial error not to give the requested instruction on the application of the emergency doctrine and, further, that a new trial should be granted because it was prejudicial error not to inform appellants' counsel that a signaling instruction earlier refused would be given and in submitting a special verdict to the jury in which issues of negligence, causation, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases