TUCKER v. SHAW

No. 412, Docket 31005.

378 F.2d 304 (1967)

Joseph TUCKER, Nicholas Makris and Charles Tucker, on behalf of Local 70 Bartenders Union of Brooklyn and Queens, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Vincent D. SHAW, Thomas J. Moore, Clinton Judge, Andrew J. Heummer, Thomas Fabbricatore and Peter F. Brennan, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided May 31, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold L. Luxemburg, New York City, for defendants-appellants.

James M. Malone, Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before MOORE, SMITH and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.


FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

This case raises the issue of whether a union's regularly retained counsel should be allowed to represent some of its officers in a suit brought against them under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 501(a), (b). Plaintiffs are three members of Local 70, Bartenders Union of Brooklyn and Queens, who have filed an action on the local's behalf against three of its officials and three employer-trustees of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases