The employer contends that the employee was an agricultural laborer and is not, therefore, subject to the coverage provisions of the Labor Law (§ 511, subd. 6). The term "agricultural laborer" is defined by statute as including, among other forms of service there enumerated, that performed "on a farm, in the employ of any person", in connection with the raising and caring for poultry (par. [a], cl. [1]); in handling, packing, processing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
