1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 35 Wis.2d
  5. 35 Wis.2d 494 (1967)
 

RATH v. DOERFLER

35 Wis.2d 494 (1967)

RATH, Respondent, v. DOERFLER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 6, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by McKenzie, Robertson, Downey & Kellogg of Appleton, and oral argument by Thomas B. McKenzie.

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Sarto Balliet, attorney, and Bradford & Gabert of counsel, all of Appleton.

HANSEN, J.

There are three issues in this case:

1. Is there sufficient credible evidence to support a jury verdict that Rath was the procuring cause of the sale to Wieseler?

2. Were the trial court's instructions to the jury incorrect or insufficient, and if so, would they affect the substantial rights of the defendant?

3. Did the trial court err in denying the defendant's offer of the entire adverse examination of the plaintiff?

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases