1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 268 F.Supp.
  5. 268 F.Supp. 255 (1967)
 

MILLER v. STEINBACH

No. 66 Civ. 356.

268 F.Supp. 255 (1967)

Irving MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Milton STEINBACH et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 3, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kaufman, Taylor, Kimmel & Miller, New York City, Stanley L. Kaufman and Shephard S. Miller, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff Miller.

White & Case, New York City, Thomas Kiernan and Michael S. Mathews, New York City, of counsel, for defendant Evans.

Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, Pa., Arthur H. Dean, Robert MacCrate, Thomas E. Patton, New York City, of counsel, for all other defendants.

OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

In this action which has been brought derivatively on behalf and for the benefit of Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "BLH"), individually on plaintiff's own behalf and representatively on behalf of all former BLH shareholders similarly situated with plaintiff except for those shareholders who participated in the transactions complained of, defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases