1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 199 So.2d
  5. 199 So.2d 310 (1967)
 

AULSBROOK v. BURKE

Nos. 7310, 7424.

199 So.2d 310 (1967)

Knight G. AULSBROOK and Dolores L. Bigelow, Appellants, v. Charles W. BURKE, As Administrator Ad Litem of Estate of Edmund A. Spence, Deceased, and Harriette C. Spence Smith, Appellees. Knight G. AULSBROOK, Appellant, v. Charles W. BURKE, As Administrator Ad Litem of the Estate of Edmund A. Spence, Deceased, Harriette C. Spence Smith and Dolores L. Bigelow, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Kaleel and Knight G. Aulsbrook, St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Charles W. Burke, St. Petersburg, for appellee Administrator ad Litem.

Fisher, Sauls, Adcock & Keough, St. Petersburg, for appellee Smith.

PER CURIAM.

There is substantial competent evidence to support the Court's finding that there was no equitable assignment to appellee, Harriette C. Spence Smith, as an individual, of the proceeds of the sale of decedent's real estate and to support the Chancellor's Order that Knight G. Aulsbrook and Dolores L. Bigelow render an accounting to appellee Burke.

The so called cross claim bore no relationship to the main...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases