STATE v. BRINKLEY

No. 8271.

428 P.2d 13 (1967)

78 N.M. 39

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vernon Eugene BRINKLEY and Floyd Wayne Pearce, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

May 29, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene E. Brockman, Tucumcari, for appellants.

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Roy G. Hill, Myles E. Flint, Asst. Attys. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee.


OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying the appellants' motions filed pursuant to § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A. 1953, being Rule 93, our Rules of Civil Procedure, to set aside sentences imposed upon them. Error is claimed because the court did not require their presence at the hearing on the motions. It is first contended that subsection (c) of Rule 93 contravenes Art. 2, § 14 of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases