1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 37 Wis.2d
  5. 37 Wis.2d 378 (1967)
 

KLUCK v. STATE

37 Wis.2d 378 (1967)

KLUCK, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 22, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there were briefs and oral argument by Dane F. Morey of Durand.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general.

HANLEY, J.

Defendant Kluck raises two issues on this review: (1) Was the evidence secured at the apartment obtained as the result of an illegal search and seizure in violation of plaintiff in error's (defendant's) constitutional rights and therefore inadmissible; (2) was there sufficient credible evidence to sustain defendant's conviction?

Legality of Search and Seizure.

The trial court held that defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases