1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 35 Wis.2d
  5. 35 Wis.2d 377 (1967)
 

STATE v. REPPIN

35 Wis.2d 377 (1967)

STATE, Respondent, v. REPPIN, Appellant. [Two cases.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 6, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Bernard Goldstein of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Robert E. Sutton, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney. general, and Hugh O'Connell, district attorney.

HALLOWS, J.

Reppin argues: (1) That his appointed trial counsel was so ineffective as not to amount to assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the constitution and consequently he may withdraw his plea of guilty as a matter of right, and (2) his guilty plea was not intelligently made and therefore he should be permitted to withdraw it.

On the evening of September 22, 1965, Reppin with one Richard Allen Jenson stole a Chevrolet automobile in the city of Milwaukee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases