1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 1 Md.
  5. 1 Md. App. 389 (1967)
 

TINGLER v. STATE

No. 140, Initial Term, 1967.

1 Md. App. 389 (1967)

230 A.2d 375

DONALD LEE TINGLER AND HARRY LEE WRIGHT v. STATE OF MARYLAND.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 6, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Hartman for appellant Tingler, and Daniel E. Klein, Jr., for appellant Wright.

Alan M. Wilner, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, Charles E. Moylan, Jr., State's Attorney for Baltimore City, and Howard Cardin, Assistant State's Attorney for Baltimore City, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before ANDERSON, MORTON, ORTH, and THOMPSON, JJ., and O'DONNELL, J., Associate Judge of the Eighth Judicial Circuit, specially assigned.

THOMPSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Donald Lee Tingler and Harry Lee Wright, the appellants, complain of a conviction for larceny after trust by the Criminal Court of Baltimore, sitting without a jury, alleging (a) the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions and (b) that they were denied due process of law because a police officer was allowed to correct his testimony after the State had rested its case.

Around noon on February...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases