HUBBARD, MOTTELAY v. HARSH BLDG.


28 A.D.2d 295 (1967)

Hubbard, Westervelt & Mottelay, Inc., Respondent, v. Harsh Building Co., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 30, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mendel Zucker for appellant.

Charles H. Miller (Michael E. Geltner with him on the brief; Marshall, Bratter, Greene, Allison & Tucker, attorneys), for respondent.

STEVENS, J. P., EAGER and STEUER, JJ., concur with CAPOZZOLI, J.; McGIVERN, J., dissents in opinion.


CAPOZZOLI, J.

This suit is based on a promissory note which was executed and delivered by the defendant-appellant in Phoenix, Arizona, in the amount of $25,194, payable to plaintiff, in New York, in seven installments. The note was given for services rendered by plaintiff in obtaining a mortgage commitment from a bank, located in New York, to finance the purchase and development of property in Arizona.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases