1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 35 Wis.2d
  5. 35 Wis.2d 282 (1967)
 

SEITZ v. SEITZ

35 Wis.2d 282 (1967)

SEITZ (Elizabeth), Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SEITZ (Frederick) and another, Defendants: SMIDL and another, Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 6, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Habush, Gillick, Habush & Davis of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Robert L. Habush.

For the respondents there was a brief by Kluwin, Dunphy, Hankin & Hayes of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Bernard J. Hankin.

CURRIE, C. J.

Plaintiff seeks a new trial on the following grounds:

(1) The apportionment of negligence is contrary to the evidence.

(2) The trial court permitted improper cross-examination of plaintiff's husband.

(3) The trial court abused its discretion in permitting defendants to amend their answer during the course of trial.

(4) The trial court erroneously excluded certain medical bills.

(5) The trial court committed error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases