1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 50 N.J.
  5. 50 N.J. 250 (1967)
 

ZENTZ v. TOOP ET AL.

50 N.J. 250 (1967)

234 A.2d 96

JACK ZENTZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES S. TOOP AND MARION TOOP, HUSBAND AND WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY AND/OR D/B/A LINCROFT SHOPPING CENTER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NATHAN SIEGEL, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND FRANK CORDASCO, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided September 25, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry H. Rubenson argued the cause for defendants-appellants and third-party plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Burton, Quackenboss, Axelrod & Rubenson, attorneys).

Mr. Vincent D. Enright, Jr. argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Harth & Enright, attorneys).

Mr. Marshall Selikoff argued the cause for third-party defendant-respondent (Messrs. Jung & Selikoff, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division. Mr. Justice Proctor and Mr. Justice Haneman vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS and SCHETTINO — 4.

For reversal — Justices PROCTOR and HANEMAN...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases